<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RQ-170 Sentinel &#8220;Beast of Kandahar&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defenceaviation.com/2009/12/rq-170-sentinel-beast-of-kandahar-confirmed-by-us-airforce.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defenceaviation.com/2009/12/rq-170-sentinel-beast-of-kandahar-confirmed-by-us-airforce.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:53:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.defenceaviation.com/2009/12/rq-170-sentinel-beast-of-kandahar-confirmed-by-us-airforce.html/comment-page-1#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenceaviation.com/?p=675#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>There are rumors of three &#039;stealthy&#039; UAVs in Kandahar, at least this explains one of them. The Predator C &#039;Avenger&#039; is probably the second, but that leaves the question, &quot;What is the other one?&quot; The sightings at Kandahar are not likely to be just this aircraft, though a subvariant or UCAV may be the case.     </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are rumors of three &#039;stealthy&#039; UAVs in Kandahar, at least this explains one of them. The Predator C &#039;Avenger&#039; is probably the second, but that leaves the question, &quot;What is the other one?&quot; The sightings at Kandahar are not likely to be just this aircraft, though a subvariant or UCAV may be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
