Comments on: Su-PAKFA a Russian Stealth Fighter http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html Metal Under Tension Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:43:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: anonim g http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html#comment-123634 anonim g Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:34:08 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=142#comment-123634 you paizanos all vrong nobody can win this war and no suvavors after shotout,dont be smart like like deak.alien comin to distroy your texnologe in one3 second and no more your fucken speech.by by life for all stupid professors and big mouse. sey yyyp! and pizdets. you paizanos all vrong nobody can win this war and no suvavors after shotout,dont be smart like like deak.alien comin to distroy your texnologe in one3 second and no more your fucken speech.by by life for all stupid professors and big mouse. sey yyyp! and pizdets.

]]> By: godzillajet http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html#comment-122770 godzillajet Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:30:39 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=142#comment-122770 Even with 3D thrust vectoring the pak-fa wont escape the f-22s aim-9x easily . Its the fastest and most maneuverable short range missile, before the russian r-73 was best . The same same is considered for the aim-120 d in medium range Even with 3D thrust vectoring the pak-fa wont escape the f-22s aim-9x easily . Its the fastest and most maneuverable short range missile, before the russian r-73 was best . The same same is considered for the aim-120 d in medium range

]]> By: godzillajet http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html#comment-122107 godzillajet Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:00:59 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=142#comment-122107 What anonymous said is more than wrong its very very wrong because the only categories in which the PAK-FA will be superior are manoeverability, weaponry and range but in an air battle of today manoeverability is not so important . The f-22 has got superior stealth(IR and radar stealth), avionics, electronics, defense, speeds will be the same. PS: The true top speed of the f-22 is still classified , so it might be possible that the f-22 is much faster , some people say it can fly mach 2.8 ! What anonymous said is more than wrong its very very wrong because the only categories in which the PAK-FA will be superior are manoeverability, weaponry and range but in an air battle of today manoeverability is not so important . The f-22 has got superior stealth(IR and radar stealth), avionics, electronics, defense, speeds will be the same.

PS: The true top speed of the f-22 is still classified , so it might be possible that the f-22 is much faster , some people say it can fly mach 2.8 !

]]> By: neil http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html#comment-111525 neil Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:10:19 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=142#comment-111525 Guess who brought america into the space age? A Nazi German scientist by the name of Wernher Von Braun. He was the pioneer behind the German V2 rocket that made the allies poop their long johns. He incorporated the technology into the Saturn V program and improved it. Why do you think there was a mad rush between the Americans and Russians to invade Germany in the last days of the war? Read up: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun</a> It seems the Americans have always lived on borrowed technology. Its as if the Yanks were born with the right to copy and snatch from others with no one having the right to criticize them. If Chinese or the Ruskies follow suit, you hear about it no end. Guess who brought america into the space age? A Nazi German scientist by the name of Wernher Von Braun. He was the pioneer behind the German V2 rocket that made the allies poop their long johns. He incorporated the technology into the Saturn V program and improved it. Why do you think there was a mad rush between the Americans and Russians to invade Germany in the last days of the war?

Read up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun

It seems the Americans have always lived on borrowed technology. Its as if the Yanks were born with the right to copy and snatch from others with no one having the right to criticize them. If Chinese or the Ruskies follow suit, you hear about it no end.

]]> By: RAD Worker http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html#comment-88138 RAD Worker Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:58:32 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=142#comment-88138 They did, search exercices with USA and IRAF in 2005. US planes were outmanuvered and outplayed thru the whole joint exercise. look it up, It is there to be researched and it was US forces who admitted they were in disadvantage against Indian pilots flying russian planes. They did, search exercices with USA and IRAF in 2005. US planes were outmanuvered and outplayed thru the whole joint exercise. look it up, It is there to be researched and it was US forces who admitted they were in disadvantage against Indian pilots flying russian planes.

]]> By: RAD Worker http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html#comment-88137 RAD Worker Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:54:05 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=142#comment-88137 LOL........LOL.......LOL USA economic advantages, LOL LMAO. I cant stop Laughing, LOL USA Economic Advantage, Please, LOL LOL……..LOL…….LOL USA economic advantages, LOL LMAO. I cant stop Laughing, LOL USA Economic Advantage, Please, LOL

]]> By: S-300 http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html#comment-82060 S-300 Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:56:30 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=142#comment-82060 Generally,this is very good opservation,argumented,but i would`nt agree only for one thing,Israel did evaded russian state of the art air defence in Syria, but not because that air defence of russian origin is inferior compared with western or it have major flaws in design,it`s just because of incompetent air defence units there or because of results of intelligence work and this factor together.Western or Israeli aviation have never attacked any really modern air defence system in conditions of similar power level,i mean,oponent with similar strength and logistics,their oponents were usually(if not always)weaker,both in techological and financial sense.So for them it was more like a drill.With poorly trained syrian units you can`t expect some exceptional results even with the most modern air defence systems. Generally,this is very good opservation,argumented,but i would`nt agree only for one thing,Israel did evaded russian state of the art air defence in Syria, but not because that air defence of russian origin is inferior compared with western or it have major flaws in design,it`s just because of incompetent air defence units there or because of results of intelligence work and this factor together.Western or Israeli aviation have never attacked any really modern air defence system in conditions of similar power level,i mean,oponent with similar strength and logistics,their oponents were usually(if not always)weaker,both in techological and financial sense.So for them it was more like a drill.With poorly trained syrian units you can`t expect some exceptional results even with the most modern air defence systems.

]]> By: myth http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html#comment-30781 myth Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:47:44 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=142#comment-30781 advanced weapons systems, million dollar, planes and state of the art technology...proved simply one thing.......with all those resources Afghan tribesmen still whooped your butts..... advanced weapons systems, million dollar, planes and state of the art technology…proved simply one thing…….with all those resources Afghan tribesmen still whooped your butts…..

]]> By: Salman Ahmed http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html#comment-23131 Salman Ahmed Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:56:34 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=142#comment-23131 yes just like pakistans money and chinese technology - yes just like pakistans money and chinese technology -

]]> By: ECG http://www.defenceaviation.com/2008/01/su-pakfa-a-russian-stealth-fighter.html#comment-1425 ECG Thu, 19 Aug 2010 04:11:59 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=142#comment-1425 Oh yea, how about Indian Mig-21 downing Pakistani Airforce Starfighters and F-86 Sabre and in return due to so much air losses for the Pakistani they gave up land and that is why Bangladesh was born!!!!. Vietnam war in which a country which has no more than 200 fighters stand against the mighty US Airforce. MiG-17 and MiG-21 downing A-4, F-4 and even B-52, yes it's true that Russian aircraft did not fare well against U.S piloted as well as against Israeli aircraft merely because of the pilot's skills that were involved (mostly Arabs). I believe the real competition will be Russian pilots vs. American Pilots, lets say MiG-29 vs F-16 and Su-27 vs F-15. I believe that the outcome will be different and I can see both F-15 and F-16 disengaging and going back to base and don't care to fly anymore...... ha ha ha ha ha...... Oh yea, how about Indian Mig-21 downing Pakistani Airforce Starfighters and F-86 Sabre and in return due to so much air losses for the Pakistani they gave up land and that is why Bangladesh was born!!!!. Vietnam war in which a country which has no more than 200 fighters stand against the mighty US Airforce. MiG-17 and MiG-21 downing A-4, F-4 and even B-52, yes it's true that Russian aircraft did not fare well against U.S piloted as well as against Israeli aircraft merely because of the pilot's skills that were involved (mostly Arabs). I believe the real competition will be Russian pilots vs. American Pilots, lets say MiG-29 vs F-16 and Su-27 vs F-15. I believe that the outcome will be different and I can see both F-15 and F-16 disengaging and going back to base and don't care to fly anymore…… ha ha ha ha ha……

]]>