Comments on: Su-PAKFA a Russian Stealth Fighter

By: innocent

innocent — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:18:07 +0000

usa copied the russian technology of puting artificial satelite in orbit

By: innocent

innocent — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:14:16 +0000

Do you people know what is want bias, ignorance and stupidity? every child thinks his dady stronger than all others.

By: dasaaa

dasaaa — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:00:32 +0000

it is fucking russian crap and it like iran steath fighter both are crap…

By: rich

rich — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:59:26 +0000

thx for info

By: yoswa

yoswa — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:00:33 +0000

anon don't seat and think no other nation in this small planet earth can counter the USA, due to budget, everything made in west is very expensive, but not very effective that is why no one in west knew that economic crisis is going to happen beside having the most advanced economic tracking system in the world and no one knew that china will beat the west sooner from recovering from economic crisis, remember the cost of first USA atom bomb against the USSR first atom bombs, and why USA space vehicles have the best astronauts killing records than the Russians, the time has changed, USA is a nation with the highest budget deficit on earth, such that it cant allocate enough funds for many research but china can do, and north korea has developed nuclear wepons or as you say it has stolen American techonology

By: AnoToo

AnoToo — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:11:28 +0000

Right – like the way you win bigtime in Afganisan… Yawn

By: Jerry

Jerry — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:02:16 +0000

Unless there is some hidden electronic stealth tech on this plane i can see potential problems with it when looking at the photographs. Look at the air intakes. They are huge and not hidden at all. It may fly great, but it won't be nearly as stealthy as the US designs.

By: cal

cal — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:26:00 +0000

The U.S. has a much bigger problem than foreign military aircraft – its a fiscal deficit of $1.5 trillion per annum and a capital account deficit of over $1 trillion per annum. America's economy will enter a period of increasingly rapid relative economic decline. In the not to distant future, U.S. defense expenditures will be cut dramatically by necessity, not choice. As U.S. standards of living decline relative to places like China or India, the bright young students from those places will stay in their home countries. (China already graduates 5 times the number of engineers as the U.S.) If you have ever seen the graduate program of elite universities (Harvard, Stanford, MIT ect) count the number of "native born" Phd aspirants. Maybe 20%. Bottom line – America is positioned vis a vis the British Empire 1900. Enjoy your "hegemony" while you can, it ain't going to last.

By: Cal

Cal — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:18:38 +0000

Stolen technology, yes ! Unfortunately for you idiots it was actually stolen from the Soviet Union. All modern stealth is based on Petr Ufimtsev's mathematical theory of diffraction published as an open source document in 1962 in the USSR and happily translated b U.S. Air Force intelligence in 1971. Ufimtsev then emirated to the U.S. and taught at UCLA where Ben Rich (head of Lockheed's F-117 program) ironically did his graduate work. As an aside, it was also a Russian mathematician that calculated the method to achieve a lunar landing which was used in the Apollo Project.

By: anon

anon — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:17:17 +0000

PAK-FA T-50's first flight occured on the 29th of January 2010. None of the pictures are accurate or current. The T-50 'Firefox' appears to be largely stolen US technology, a bastardized F-22/YF-23/Su-27. The plane undeniably has stolen US features and is barely a Russian design at all.