Comments on: How was F-117 shot down? http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html Metal Under Tension Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:43:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Zoltan http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html#comment-122524 Zoltan Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:56:10 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=3#comment-122524 I heard he modified the radar by changing capacitors so it can operate at longer wavelengths. I heard he modified the radar by changing capacitors so it can operate at longer wavelengths.

]]> By: Bamm Bamm http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html#comment-93238 Bamm Bamm Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:56:53 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=3#comment-93238 Incorrect. It was detected by algorithm techniques of multi phase plotting of TV and radio-station signals. That is why the USA started bombing civilian stations, increasing the loss of innocent life. Another sotry I have heard, but cannot confirm is that the mig21 closed to guns range - and had a spray at the fighter. Either or - it's toast. Further more, it proved techniques for detecting stealth fighters - which have advanced considerably. Read more about harmonics - and parasitic adaptive antennae elements using fuzzy logic control circuits. When is a stealth plane not a stealth plane? When it is an American strealth plane! Incorrect.

It was detected by algorithm techniques of multi phase plotting of TV and radio-station signals.
That is why the USA started bombing civilian stations, increasing the loss of innocent life.

Another sotry I have heard, but cannot confirm is that the mig21 closed to guns range – and had a spray at the fighter.
Either or – it's toast. Further more, it proved techniques for detecting stealth fighters – which have advanced considerably.
Read more about harmonics – and parasitic adaptive antennae elements using fuzzy logic control circuits.

When is a stealth plane not a stealth plane? When it is an American strealth plane!

]]> By: Zoltan Dani http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html#comment-44014 Zoltan Dani Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:28:37 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=3#comment-44014 SORRY,WE DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS INVISIBLE SORRY,WE DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS INVISIBLE

]]> By: Luis http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html#comment-8 Luis Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:59:03 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=3#comment-8 First of all F117 should'n use cover aircraft. What is the sense of the stealth technology then? And all those things are just speculations. Here is another. Russians knowing US was going to bomb Serbia problably gave them some tips about how to spot them. Pretty sure they knew how by then. First of all F117 should'n use cover aircraft. What is the sense of the stealth technology then? And all those things are just speculations. Here is another. Russians knowing US was going to bomb Serbia problably gave them some tips about how to spot them. Pretty sure they knew how by then.

]]> By: achilis http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html#comment-7 achilis Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:57:00 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=3#comment-7 those f-16s which were supposed to give cover to that f-117 would hav been atleast 5000 feet above and behind the 117...not in a circular formation at the same altitude around it.....that is the usual way of givin air cover for any bomber....so i dont think the logic u posted is from a reliable source... those f-16s which were supposed to give cover to that f-117 would hav been atleast 5000 feet above and behind the 117…not in a circular formation at the same altitude around it…..that is the usual way of givin air cover for any bomber….so i dont think the logic u posted is from a reliable source…

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html#comment-6 Anonymous Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:58:00 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=3#comment-6 No I can see the logic, the defenders are meant to concentrate on the obvious targets thus not realising there is a fifth invisible target in the middle.BR/BR/Not exactly great logic, but this is the American air force we are talking about. No I can see the logic, the defenders are meant to concentrate on the obvious targets thus not realising there is a fifth invisible target in the middle.BR/BR/Not exactly great logic, but this is the American air force we are talking about.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html#comment-5 Anonymous Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:00:00 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=3#comment-5 This can not be the case as this would almost certainly compromise its cover. They always flew alone. This can not be the case as this would almost certainly compromise its cover. They always flew alone.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html#comment-4 Anonymous Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:22:00 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=3#comment-4 This is not important, but for dots cannot form a circle. :) This is not important, but for dots cannot form a circle. :)

]]> By: Larkins http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html#comment-3 Larkins Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:00:00 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=3#comment-3 @AnonymousBR/BR/Wow... Never heard that before. Thanks for bringing it up. @AnonymousBR/BR/Wow… Never heard that before. Thanks for bringing it up.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html#comment-2 Anonymous Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:52:00 +0000 http://test.larkins.org/?p=3#comment-2 i heard a rumor in serbia that the f117A was easy to spot because it had an enterouge of visible aircraft around it. prob f16s. on the radar, u could imagine, seeing four dots in the shape of a circle. the soldier operating the battery was told to concentrate on the black space on the radar in the centre of the surrounding dots/aircraft. he was told to shoot at the black space when in range. next thing u know it an invisible f117A was destroyed. i heard a rumor in serbia that the f117A was easy to spot because it had an enterouge of visible aircraft around it. prob f16s. on the radar, u could imagine, seeing four dots in the shape of a circle. the soldier operating the battery was told to concentrate on the black space on the radar in the centre of the surrounding dots/aircraft. he was told to shoot at the black space when in range. next thing u know it an invisible f117A was destroyed.

]]>